Aaron S. Hawley (aaronhawley) wrote,
Aaron S. Hawley

Study Emacs with Lisp or natural language?

There was a back and forth between Emacs bloggers Jared Dilettante and Ian Eure about whether Emacs users should write Emacs Lisp code for their own purposes or whether working in Emacs Lisp should primarily be in support of existing modes--and with the mode's documentation thoroughly read. At this point, the argument has fizzled out, but its worth pointing out that a manual for SQL mode doesn't seem to exist. SQL mode, like most Emacs modes, is self-documented well. However, this argument is evidence that it could probably use a manual.

As someone who's neither a trained writer nor a good one, I know that writing in one's own spoken language is difficult. However, writing concise documentation about Emacs can be just as important as writing Emacs Lisp code, if not maybe more so. Writing documentation will give you a deeper understanding of how something works and help you learn things you didn't already know. It's also important because the documentation you write will help someone else to learn how to use Emacs, too.

Documenting Emacs also improves your Emacs Lisp skills because you'll likely be reading other hacker's Emacs Lisp code. Most important of all you'll be working on existing code for Emacs rather than making more when it is not entirely necessary to reinvent the wheel.

Don't get me wrong. It's fine to twiddle code. Reinventing the wheel is the basis for higher education and university study and critical to life-long learning. However, writing code and championing your work as a solution only acts to avoid studying and maintaining existing code and risks distracting the Emacs community from progress. In a way, it's almost anti-social.

I know some Emacs hackers think multiple implementations are important, and "I wouldn't have learned as much if I didn't manage my own Emacs package". These arguments are spurious, though. One should be able to earn these same benefits--and more--by joining in on an existing project, rather than forking a new one. It may take more effort but its the right thing to do and is under my column of "best practices".

The GNU General Public License gives the Emacs hacker a lot of freedom, but we all could still use the occasional self-discipline.
Tags: emacs, free software, programming, software
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.